[sillysally]

Ok, I understand it better now Greg but you brought up a good point, you called it a fact. Theory isn't fact is it? Why isn't it called the 'fact of everything' instead of the 'theory of everything'? FOE vs TOE?

Another thing, shouldn't this fact of everything be more than just words and numbers? Isn't there something missing in trying to understand everything? Like I have said before, it needs to be more of a demo somehow, a show instead of a tell. Think about it, people have been pondering and writing about it for thousands of years and nobody has proved anything, so I guess that proves my point that it will have to be something other than writing. And that's where science and technology come in, technology will show it better than any words. I don't think it can be explained, I don't think words can describe it, wouldn't it be much more than that? It has to be beyond comprehension of words since so far we haven't found the right words and I am sure billions of combinations have been attempted.