Quote:
Originally Posted by Tina  All I know is that for Protheory to be correct there needs to be a dynamic explained in terms of (+) (-) and (0) with (O) meaning neutral as in neither (+) or (-) but "something else". (O) does not mean NOTHING. |
The essential question from the above is according to me: can the truth be known as an absolute truth. This was discussed before, and my reply is: there is no such thing as an absolute truth (and I consider that an absolute truth, though of an abstract kind which does not require substantiation). I believe that truths can only exist within their own contexts.
So, to say that "(0) does not mean NOTHING" requires explaining the context, otherwise the words are not fully correct/the contents not fully delivered. I can say that
(0) means NOTHING but it requires me to explain the context.
As Aristotle mentioned, there is the absence of a third way. Anytime we use such a specific context, looking for the third part means not finding it. Yet we also know that these dualities are limited in scope. The third part therefore is that what has NOTHING in common with the duality. With Tina, I can then say this aspect is neutral. Yet is this set up sufficient enough to guide us towards the toe?