Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick  John,like what you are saying here,the eternal forever NOW is ever present,(how could it be otherwise)we look out with our through our temporal eyes at what "appears" to be a
changing world and become confused.
Outwardly things change,but we know deep within us that there is an eternal now,so,
looking without causes confusion,looking within restores the balance.
regards michael. |
I appreciate the approval Michael.
I would like to hear about the thoughts relative to a minimum quanta of time as defined for the being, used as a standard of measurement for observations of our existence medium. Before answering think about the implications of the very small time measurements that are used in QM as being made non rational because the measurements are made in a frame that is smaller than we have just defined for the existence of a being. The being needs a frame that is much larger than what is being used to make measurements in QM. This is why I feel QM may be useful but misleading.
It may be that the quantum being / quantum time
defines a minimum size slice of time that is much larger than what we are trying to define in QM. This may be the reason that we see a breakdown in our normal common sense method of understanding our universe.
To simplify still more:
Maybe QM is breaking up time into smaller slices than it should be.
When we measure 1 nano second. We measure it with relative methods. We do not know if 1 nano second exists within the same existence frame as the last. maybe an existence frame is 10 nano seconds. This would put us as a being into a frame that is always just NOW. It does however make it impossible for us to examine the building blocks of our existence medium that require us to determine a frame of existence smaller than the 10 nano seconds.
John.