Quote:
Originally Posted by neutralino  No, I do not. These have not been independently verified and thus it would be foolish to take such things as truth. |
correction my sincere friend. John Searl has been indepedently verified and replicated by Roschin and Godin and published in Technical Physics Letters
http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm
David Hamel too has been validated and replicated independently. Do you still not believe it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neutralino No. It's not as simply as saying that "mass curves spacetime." This is the usual explanation of GR that is presented to the popular science audience, but it is not entirely correct. If you look at Einstein's field equations, you will see that it is actually the energy-momentum tensor that is responsible for the curvature of spacetime. |
Call it what you want but semantics and terminology are not the issue here. The point is nothing can be effected by gravity that does not also produce some amount of gravity itself. Like effects like. Do you realize this to be true?