Thread: An Idea
View Single Post
austintorn@aol.com
Grandmaster

austintorn@aol.com's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,445
Blog Entries: 28
78 austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute

Awards Showcase
Member of the Quarter 
Total Awards: 1

Quote  
01-25-2008, 08:47 PM
Re: An Idea

Since there cannot be something from nothing, there could be no creation of the ultimate ground of all reality; however, this doesn't apply to space-times, for they come and go, space being emergent from something underneath. The "underneath" is eternal and somewhat like the like the quantum realm, in that it is neither here nor not here, but everywhere and nowhere. This probability of possibilities is in between existence and non-existence, but really neither.

So, we don't have to worry about why the "underneath" was the exact right "stuff" (an ever present question about eternal stuff), since it is but possibility, which covers any and all possible results.

As for why the universe worked, only the stable particles were possible and so they remained and combined.
Reply With Quote
austintorn@aol.com is online nowReport Post
 
Samsung | Synchronization fast and easy | Loans | MPAA | Credit Cards