Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus  Melanie
There are three of your articles on the web in 'Contributors Toe Articles', two with voice but none placed in a feature position as yet. Listen to them and read the transcript. I would suggest that you consider an edit that is more designed to be read although I find no real problem with the way that they are now.
It's a pleasure to read something that is so correct in every way, although I don't really like religious representation because we are utterly ecumenical but you did mention budda and used a small j for jesus so I let it pass.
This is a learning experience in that articles that are designed to be read are slightly different from those designed to be spoken. An edit wouldn't hurt in the light of that.
suit yourself, be as picky as you like, I really don't have anything better to do 
Also You might consider using your full name and including a small photo, but that's up to you. Let me know about the titles, I just used what came first.
Rufe |
Rufe,
jesus and buddha, were metaphorical historic figures,along with countless others, all stories made up by man, used for teaching purposes only,
they were not literal figures,pure myths imo,
this is only my assumption.
and yet people from all religious denominations still hold the idea that they are real people, and not just metaphors for spirituality.
today the word spirituality and religion are concepts like every other word
completely meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
There is only SEE -ing .... in THIS arising IS- ness which is already self evident.
melanie.