View Single Post
to e or not to e
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
to e or not to e - 02-06-2008, 12:49 PM

To be or not to be was what Shakespeare said more than 500 years ago. Now, the most important philosophical question is to e or not to e. To e is to accept irrationality but not to e is to accept rationality.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote