View Single Post
Re: to e or not to e
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
mkirkpatrick
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: to e or not to e - 02-06-2008, 01:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
To be or not to be was what Shakespeare said more than 500 years ago. Now, the most important philosophical question is to e or not to e. To e is to accept irrationality but not to e is to accept rationality.

I think there is room for both,bit like Ying and Yang!



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (02-06-2008)