Theory of Everything - View Single Post - Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)

N0B0DY · **Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here) -** 02-07-2008, 08:55 AM

The Theory of Nothing (TON), which as you will see I interpret as being synonymous to the Theory of Everything (TOE), is based upon the absolute unification - and hence negation - of the universal forces that produce all natural phenomena. It is a journey toward the absolute realization of the equivalence of “nothing” and “everything” in order to draw logical conclusions about the nature of existence.

It has long been decided that there are “things” and then there are “no things”. Yet the further we delve into matter, the further we verify the “space” between so-called particles. http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10

“Things” are formed through interactions that cancel out at zero as a whole; the realization of the non existence of the absolute state of "one" solves all seeming dichotomy paradoxes; and all massive particles (there is provably no such thing as rest mass) are created through the interactions of a massless substance (light) that provably does not literally exist. http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/e144/science1202.html

I suggest a returning to First Philosophy and ask: how can the universe, or rather omniverse, be contained by a non-existent exterior, let alone expand?

	(#1 (permalink))
N0B0DY 9th degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 1,941 Thanks Given: 0 Thanked 110x in 104 Posts Join Date: Jan 2007 Rep Power: 27	Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here) - 02-07-2008, 08:55 AM The Theory of Nothing (TON), which as you will see I interpret as being synonymous to the Theory of Everything (TOE), is based upon the absolute unification - and hence negation - of the universal forces that produce all natural phenomena. It is a journey toward the absolute realization of the equivalence of “nothing” and “everything” in order to draw logical conclusions about the nature of existence. It has long been decided that there are “things” and then there are “no things”. Yet the further we delve into matter, the further we verify the “space” between so-called particles. http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10 “Things” are formed through interactions that cancel out at zero as a whole; the realization of the non existence of the absolute state of "one" solves all seeming dichotomy paradoxes; and all massive particles (there is provably no such thing as rest mass) are created through the interactions of a massless substance (light) that provably does not literally exist. http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/e144/science1202.html I suggest a returning to First Philosophy and ask: how can the universe, or rather omniverse, be contained by a non-existent exterior, let alone expand?