[N0B0DY]

Relative mass in motion can be explained without the paradoxical side effects by it being recreated over an infinite number of non-dimensional points, much like an animation on a computer screen. There is no literal movement, but a recreated quantity of bits of information gives the impression of movement. Taken a step further, the distance between relative point masses can be explained in terms of time instead of space.

Looking at your hand in front of your face, you would naturally think is different from getting a slap in the face because there is a spatial distance between them, but if your hand and face occupied the same non-dimensional point at different times, then space must be an illusion of time. The "view" of the hand and the "slap" by the hand can be the result of slowing down the speed of light, which I propose is absolute (non-existent) because there is no distance to travel. This is based in part on the Uncertainty Principle whereby as we pinpoint absolute position, momentum is thence absolute; zero space means then absolute speed.

To make it perhaps clearer: a decrease of this speed creates not only observable mass, the infinite gathering of infinitesimal particles, but stretches time to infinity proportionate to the reduction in speed, hence the reason for the claim of "c" in only a relatively-vacuous vacuum.

All possible states, every conceivable scenario, can be seen then to occur at the same point, but at different times. Whereby, in the instance of the hand referred to above, it has already slapped you in the face but not until you are consciously/observably aware of it. This is the point when consciousness becomes a factor in merging with the subconscious functioning of subatomic particles, when the sensory awareness of the hand becomes a realized state, from the reduction of absolute speed which increases space to the point of impact. Again, based on momentum through time, not space.