If "sight" were removed from our sensorial capacity, leaving no "eye" with which to see one would necessarily have to "see" with their imagination only, followed by the thinking labelling mechanism, from which the "dispute" [controversy] originally arose.
Stilling the activity of the relatively conscious thinking mechanism is akin to sleep where dreams, and sometimes epiphanies, materialeyes.
I'm sure uncle Albert was familiar with the faculty.
" 'I am' the
consumate artist,
I draw on [attract from] my imagination."
In relative terms it is a state of non-being.
As a useful faculty when developed,
it is a Be-ing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  I would say only "existent" as a word, or can be scientifically-defined as a relativistic spatial construct.
Yet, I don't dispute relativists' sense of reality, primarily because it is based upon a subjective truth - "Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder."
Lies because it is based upon relativistic optical illusions limited by observational capacities. |