[N0B0DY]

Re: T.o.N. (Theory of Nothing) - 08-11-2007, 07:01 PM - N0B0DY

Exactly, Fredrick (ToeQuest Member), no delivery can be neutral and egoless. The gateway is neutral and irrespective of personal views and deliveries.

My claim is merely that the toe, unification of forces, all-inclusive delivery, absolute, can't exist because if it did it would be differentiated from non existence.

Eternity is based on knowledge that cannot be known without perfect knowledge of all consequences, and therefore cannot be expressed in words based on partial knowledge. Your evidence would apply in this latter case, but there is no mathematician alive with the capability to simplify the complex math to the point where there can be an understanding. It is pointless to even try.

Just like there is a fine line between timelessness and eternity, and spacelessness and infinity, I think there is a fine line between our implications. Yours are based on an infinite number of relative frameworks existing for eternity; mine on the absolute framework not existing at any time.

Perhaps a good analogy would be trying to separate a drop of water amidst the ocean. It is only possible if the drop is differentiated from the ocean - as per taking the drop out of the ocean. Yet, attempting to conceive the same in order to account for "particles" or "waves" or "strings," in an absolute universe, is pointless because there is no differentiable "place" to conceive.

Relative separation is an illusion, and absolute unification is impossible.