View Single Post
Re: continuous vs. discrete symmetry
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
mkirkpatrick
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Re: continuous vs. discrete symmetry - 02-12-2008, 03:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
continuous vs. discrete symmetry

Hadamard matrices possess continuous symmetry not discrete left-right symmetry of parity operation. When a circle is rotated whether clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) by someone when another person is not looking there is no way the person can tell whether it has rotated. This is an example of continuous symmetry. In this sense, Hadamard matrices are represented by two linked circles where and when each undergoes continuous rotations CW or CCW. The mirror image represents a broken discrete symmetry of parity operation. The original is H+ the image is H-. Together they represent basic quanta of spacetime. The smallest matrix that can be used to represent a quantum is a 2 by 2 real elements matrix where the elements are e11=1, e12=-1, e21=-1, and e22=1 for H+. They are e11=-1, e12=1, e21=1, and e22=-1 for H-. The determinants of these 2 by 2 matrices are all zero implying that multiplicative inverse does not exist.

This is leading somewhere,i just know it!


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Reply With Quote