View Single Post
imaginary equations
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
imaginary equations - 02-15-2008, 12:18 PM

At the heart or gut of quantum mechanics is Schrödinger wave equation. However, its successful descriptions of atomic spectra do not justify ignoring or taking for granted the undeniable fact that it is absolutely an imaginary equation. It would be more or less forgettable or forgivable if it is simply an imaginary or real inequality analogous to the uncertainty expressions DxDph or DtDEh.

Furthermore, when Dirac extended it into his relativistic wave equation, he made it even more imaginary by introducing zero metric spinors. Fortunately, Dirac equation surpasses the successes of Schrödinger wave equation. For one important thing, it predicted the existence of antimatter. However, the wavefunction Y remains in the shadowy realm of imagination. So far, all attempts to break its imaginary walls failed miserably.

Back in 1926, Max Born’s probabilistic interpretation of Y into a probability wavefunction allows accurate measurements for the absolute squares of the conjugate product |Y*Y| requiring only normalization of its integral ò|Y*Y|=1. Today, if |Y*Y| describes the 4th power of complex imaginary then the best measured outcomes are all negative real numbers. On the other hand, its 8th power descriptions |Y*Y| can measure all but positive real numbers. These would be helpful in eliminating all physical concepts of dark matter, dark energy, graviton, Higgs boson, magnetic monopole, gluon, axion, tachyon, and all supersymmetric particles. Most of all is to initiate the downfall of all superstring theories, rendering them unnecessary for further formulations of physical theories and delivering them into the heap of everlasting oblivion.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote