Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  I'm not sure if I'm reading you right, but I think the reason you may not be getting any "bites" is because what you have written is consistent with the present model on the one hand and is a known work in progress on the other. There is nothing to argue with.
The only thing that struck me as odd is your contention about motion. The present model is based on things within the universe allegedly moving from the expansion of spacetime. I don't think anyone is anymore thinking the universe can't move, except myself. |
Thanks for your post, NOBODY. I was starting to feel a bit lonely in here. I'm interested in how my theory is consistent with the present model. Could you give me examples? In the past when I have discussed my ideas with mathematicians and physicist, I have been told that my idea is very inconsistent with GR and QM because it gives light a resting frame of reference, because it implies a fourth spatial dimension in which light and matter operate, and because it opines that the "observable" universe is moving through the fourth dimension (most scientists don't consider expansion the same as motion).
Einstein describes the observabe universe in a 3d + 1d structure. In that structure all past, present and future moments are stored in the universal structure. Future moments already exist, we humans just haven't reached them yet. Each of these moments is sometimes refered to as hyperplanes. Einstein handles hyperplanes differently from Newton, but both scientists believed that hyperplanes are stacked up and stored in some way in the universal structure.
I describe a single moving and reconfiguring hyperplane. In a sense, my structure is 4d - 1d. In that structure there is a universe of 4 dimensions, but our observable universe is a three dimensional surface falling through 4 dimensional space. Past moments do not persist in this structure. The past is merely the wake of the hyperplane upon which we ride. The future does not exist in this structure. The future is a trajectory that lies before the hyperplane upon which we ride. Time is not a navigable medium. So time travel is out of the question. If the hyperplane were to reverse course, we would not experience past moments, we would simply continue reconfiguring (perhaps in a castrophic way, but reconfiguring none the less).
I argue that time is not a dimension, but a property associate with motion, that if time were to stop, changes of state would stop (decay, regeneration, quantum reconfiguration), but changes of position on large scales could continue to take place. The universe would not suddenly freeze up. Motion in 4-space over durations would continue, but matter would no longer decompose.
Finally, with light at rest, I think we can talk about consciousness in interesting ways. Resting light becomes the pattern for matter, the organizing principle that organizes organisms at the subconscious level, and the seat of creativity and choice at the conscious level.