[N0B0DY]

Wick,

I was referring to Lemaitre's and Guth's big-bang and inflationary model, and as I interpret it and the new research being done by Hau and gravitomagnetism, I don't find anything that conflicts with your theory. Aside from how I interpret motion, I agree with your flatland analogies as they seem to imply the 3-d universe is the result of frame dragging due to a 4th-d time/motion.

Even the "out-on-the-limb" decay as light interacts throughout the plane I agree with, but I don't understand this, though:

"When light directly strikes a particle of matter (somehow the fine structure constant fits in here), it enters the plane (it is not emitted) using the particle as a "door", and begins moving through the surface of the plane until it finds a "door" out (it is not absorbed). In both cases the light energizes the matter it interacts with."

Perhaps when you get a minute you can elaborate on it. It appears that emission and absorption are reversed for some known reason.