Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Rp,
Thanks for the vote of confidence, but the above commentary was (in part) a question to discern where exactly these issues are headed.
We've hit a few bumps with regards to our interpretations over matter, mass, steady acceleration vs static state, etc. and after looking through your site again I think we would have to settle our own battle before entering a war. Yet, there have been a few folks who mentioned that your work is difficult to navigate through, and if you would be willing to streamline it as far as what you would want included in a book, minus any violations of copyright, I would put it together in a book format so you could promote it in a more condensed form.
I would do it, without co-authorship, and send it to you to see if you are satisfed with it before publishing it. Again, if you feel anything I've written anywhere is useful to you, incorporate without credit and I'll put everything in an e-book.
Fair enough? |
In good conscience you must be accredited with all and any contributions included in the work, Nobody. I hope your amenable to that clause.
The work is very much a reconstructive anthology of the work of others, which is also a method of authenticating.
Certainly credit to you includes putting it in an e-book.
Yes. The material in its presently unedited state is difficult to navigate and needs streamlining. While still learning and gathering data it may be a while before it's in a more presentable form.
Of course your proposal is (much) more than fair enough; to say the least.
(As this comes to pass, Nobody, I sincerely think it would be inappropriate not to accredit you with all contributions of every description, per item... Thank you very much. Any disagreements between us can be part of the story.)
Best regards to you and yours,
- RP