[N0B0DY]

No need to squint on that one, Austin, though I did anyway because it is a very controversial read. I think if we put the two together in a particular fashion, we could end up with the many versions of Roman Catholicism.

I stand firm on what is not speaking through the rear, Austin; that there is neither freedom nor restraint in this world...try holding your breath. Yet their is a way to breathe without breathing that is quite liberating.

It is one thing to have a luxury of standing back and taking in the world in its many wonderous forms, or partaking in this, that or the other. Yet what can be done about the cancer patient confined to a bed, or the ones who lost their arms in a war for freedom. They might decide to draw with their toes, or maybe drink themselves to death. Should we care about them, or is that merely a part of universal expression or cosmic justice for things folks only think they are responsible for?

The Earth analogy I used can be thought and has been referred to as being simplistic, but it conveys perspectives and holistic transformation by flipping the world on its head in order to realize the potential buried within the subconscious mind. The folks looking top-down at the Earth are arguing with the folks looking bottom-up at the Earth, each claiming they know which way the Earth is spinning, when the Earth isn't spinning at all.

As implied in the above-linked except, there is only relative motion, never any such absolute motion; and the motional leads to emotional and mental imbalances that can never be controlled using the means that causes such unbalance.