| | |
| The Observer
Status: Offline Posts: 1,899
Thanks Given: 38
Thanked 235x in 185 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005 Rep Power: 37 | Re: absolute rest? -
03-11-2008, 08:35 PM
analog; You’ve chosen to start over from scratch rather than accept current interpretations; sometimes that is what it takes to actually comprehend current interpretations. The only difference between your view and mine is that mine is where your view will be in 33 more years. Maybe I can save you a few headaches. You seem to be viewing “matter” as something that can be broken down into smaller and smaller pieces of itself. This leads to a dead-end; I know, I’ve been there. Rather than thinking of matter as fundamental particles, try to imagine a fundamental substance (FS) that can produce the observed phenomena (more like a fluid); then determine the minimum fundamental properties needed by that substance to explain all known phenomena. Once you’ve done this, you will find that a collision scenario of this FS rises to the most probable cause of our universe as we know it today. Thermodynamics and wave mechanics will help you advance you concept. I have not expanded my blog into the more complex interactions of waves and their harmonics. Quote:
Originally Posted by analog If absolute particle motion exists, then, it is a property of the particle as we both agree, and no energy is needed. But, to admit to absolute motion with no variable energy would have to be admitting to absolute speed of particles. Therefore, if particles are identical in speed and size, what is your mechanism to apply to group (planetary) motion. By definition, the characteristics of a rotating sphere means that the particles near the center are covering less distance in the same amount of time as particles that maintain their relative position to them further out along the edges of the sphere. This would seem to imply different velocities between the two, but we said that couldn't be.
I was just wondering would this effect the system you were describing and do you have a mechanism such as a change in resonate frequency to explain this. I have my own approach to it, but I was curious on your thoughts. Or have I gotten way off on your system? | The absolute motion of a particle system is made up of 3 fundamental types of motion: linear, angular, and randomized motion. It is how a particle distributes the quantity of these types of motion that produce both energy and mass. If you randomize all the uniform motion (mass) of a particle you convert the particle to electromagnetic radiant energy (expanding space). It would then be part of the universe system and no longer an autonomous unit or particle. What we call particles today are actually structures of harmonic fields (resonance) of FS. When you get to the quark level particle, the fields are controlled by the wave symmetry of the point source particle if its positive; negative particle structures do not have a point source particle core. Let me know if I can help you avoid the many paths to obscurity on this trek you’ve started. David |
|
| |