[dleviwing]

1.. You ask the reader to believe space is made up of some kind of layering of a sphere like structure. This infers a background entity; what is it made of if not matter? If you’re going to use an analogy then use something that does not require a magical imagination to accept. You require an Aether or one of the other names for such a background like space-time-continuum, quantum foam, etc.

2.. “Two particles propagate universally, space is created between them.” Again; what are you referring to as space; an empty void or physical entity?

Your site is full of such holes that indicate a lack of understanding of physics on your part.

Any theory must be backward compatible to KNOWN PHENOMENA; this means a new theory must be able to explain phenomena as well or better than its predecessor. Your theory lacks this requirement; you are ahead of some only due to your understanding that motion is an important factor in comprehending physical reality. I might suggest that you stop thinking that scientist are intellectual morons and start understanding the concepts and terminologies of the profession. I have read many theories presented by neophytes and yours does not even rank in the top 50 but it does show a unique thinking ability.

You can start here if you truly are seeking guidance.
http://lightandmatter.com/