[futrethink]

---To any readers who think that this post is an insult to their intelligence, due to the multiple and blatantly obvious statements of facts, I must mention that this is not how it should be seen. As with any hypothesis, the originator of such must present all their facts in connection with it and all the connections between those facts that brought it about.
---I have stated that the concept of ‘interaction’ is the root cause of evil and have been, somewhat, challenged to explain it. The following extensive reading is the answer to such.
---Since I have so many things to bring to the display table, I’m going to start with something small: how a “choice” is made.
---A choice as defined, by most dictionaries, as one of two things: a noun or a verb.
---To my way of thinking, you can’t make a choice unless you have nouns with which to do the verb. Thereby, the entirety of the concept of an objective ‘choice’ is any and all nouns, from the past, present and possible future, in connection with and the verb/action itself.
---That being out of the way, on to the breakdown of how a choice occurs on the physical(matter) and/or spiritual(emotional) and/or mental(thinking) levels and seemingly instantaneously.
---A choice is required as a part of existence. To make that choice, the following occurs; an objective concept is perceived/interacted with. This is either a massenergy object appearing within an individual’s perceptions or a path/need/ideal that is to be reached. Either way; the first thing that occurs is an interaction of perceptions. An individual doesn’t cooperate with something that it has just perceived, it just interacts with it.
~~~~~~Available facts/information/variables from past existence is taken and brought forward and acknowledged as a part of that individual’s existence.
~~~~~~The surrounding environment and all information pertaining to that point in space and time is perceived/accepted as being a part of the individual’s existence.
~~~~~~The original idea/belief/concept of what was expected to be the possible future, from the previous point in time, is brought forward, accepted/acknowledged and then examined in connection with the previously noted object/objective.
~~~~~~During the examination of the original future, the connection between the new object/objective and the new object/objective itself, the previously mentioned past and present information is brought forward and used to predict any and all, new possible futures that might result.
~~~~~~Examinations of the new possible futures are made.
~~~~~~The most likely/probable/positive/okay/good futures/timelines are selected and the remaining futures are discarded/removed/noted as negative/bad/evil from the choice process.
~~~~~~A single possible end-result is selected as the most positive choice. A period of time for that end-result is determined. The possible futures/timelines and the information needed for to reach the previously selected end-result are examined.
~~~~~~The information and the future/timeline that is considered/believed the most wanted/positive/possible to reach the single possible end-result are selected. All other information and futures/timelines are noted as/believed to be the most negative/least likely for to reach that single possible end-result and discarded.
---The final action of the choice is to cause an action to occur that will cause/start that one singular future/timeline to become a part of existence and that might have the believed to be one possibly final needed end-result.

---I might have missed a few steps or thought that they were unimportant enough to put in, but the above is as basic as I believe is needed for now.

---The above is the same for any singular individual, from the smallest thing through human beings and onto the largest thing in existence.
---The reasoning behind the immediately above statement is this; any individual is made up of something that is only qualifiable at the most basic level. It can only be perceived as something that is and it is a solid individual thing that has to be taken as a whole. It has/is/will not been/being/be fully proven to have any quality to it. This is because of something that can never be proven to exist, even if it has an existence (as long as there is existence); nonexistence.
---One thing that cannot be proven is that this something thinks. It will only be believed that this something has been proven to think.
---From that; all we can do is prove that we humans only believe that we think. In essence, we react to things made up of massenergy/space/time (past, now and possible future) that we perceive/interact as the concepts of ‘positive/good’ and ‘negative/bad’.
---I am going to leave the discussion of; what other beings are self-conscious, out of this post, as that will lead to what is and is not to be considered ‘intelligence.’

Part 1.