Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar  Well firstly, a swirl (2 D) would be much simpler than a vortex, second, nature has a method of simplifying and straightening things out. We might not understand it completely, but every problem has a perfectly logical and simple natural answer.. |
I now understand where did you query come from, perhaps you meant to ask on what is the simplest form nature would choose, instead of a particular shape.
In this sense you are in the right direction, a swirl (2d) as the shape of a flat disk, good shot!. Take a look at this image, a brown dwarf OTS 44. Evidently, it did try to reduce to that shape by having lost a dimension.
And I believe give it the power it will try to reduce further, i.e. integrate back to relative nothingness and loose the other two physical dimensions apparently if it could, probably by spinning into a source of light beyond our optical bandwidth, the simplest form of existence possible. However, limited by the circumstances of this physical world, it can only do as much as it could, therefore would appear in the most efficient forms in a perfect state of equilibriums, observable as a funnel like shape entity extendable to a flat disc shape. The below html page will give you a better idea illustrated with an animation.
http://www.singularvortex.com/WFE%20...ry%20rings.htm
Keep your core searching questions coming, there are still many areas in UVS that requires deep penetrations. In the events when the answers cannot match your queries, it would still serve as food for thought and might then inspire us to new perspectives of significant.
Best to you.