Quote:
Originally Posted by everymansmedium  Hi Dipayankar:
STOP!
I just had a thought! There would be no gravity without mass the two words are each relative to each other.
Just had a thought of where it might be worth looking. It is always a reaction to mass. What makes mass reluctant to change / movement?
This relates to the amount of energy that is required to move it. The more mass the more energy is required to move it. Looking from the other vantage point of mass. (E=mc2) not only does mass relate to the amount of energy required to move it, it also relates to the amount of energy that it REPRESENTS. This might be a good place for some calculations to show a relativity between the amount of energy that it represents as compared to the amount of energy that is required to move it. How does E relate to the E that is required to move it. This should truly define gravity. It may show it as the weak force that it is.
The relative number that results might relate to other numbers that indicate still more enlightening relativity. I hope that I give you another route to get to where you want to be.
John EMM |
Hello friends:
This thought that I indicate might simply be a different form of the same formula. M=C^2/E Is it viewed as M=(speed to accelerate to)^2/E ?
This is a good example of a spontaneous thought that did not stand the test of time.
John
http://unit-unity-community.com