Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar  Great idea... so a reaction to a reaction will weaken the initial force and hence Gravity is a weak force. Now how do we mathematically prove it?? |
Hello Dipayankar:
The energy will only get weaker if it is being dispersed in more than one direction. If the action / reaction is a single trail of events the reaction will equal the action. The only thing that can be said of this is that it is possible that we are not seeing the total force because of undetected dispersal.
This is why the thought of the creation of space is also interesting as we do not know that a force is required to initiate the creation of space and that gravity might be a reaction to that. It does seem logical to me to feel that creation of a space field requires force. Then also the consideration that the field that is space also represents force. Then gravity might simply be the reaction to the creation of the space field.
There are many that say that space is nothing. To them I say, if it is nothing then how is it expanding. My feeling is that it is a 3 dimensional field, and that a force is required to generate this field. This thought applies as well to time. Then the field is a bipole, and results with a space field as one pole and a time field as the result of the other. If it is a field, then a force is required to generate both of these fields. Then gravity is a reaction to mass within the space field, and the initial force is that which generated the space field itself.
This led me to think about this creation of space as a natural phenomena that is part also of a duality. Wherein the reverse of creation takes place at the event horizon as the redshift where the edge of the universe travels beyond our ability to detect it, then returns at now to become the space that appears to be created new at the point of creation NOW. Then also the same takes place with the matter that is lost to come back to be spit out of a black hole in a stream that travels across much space. These thoughts do not seem to have a logical trail that can be followed throughout the cycle that I indicate. However everything in this universe seems to be focused on the observer. The observer is always at the center. The observation in quantum physics has its effect to alter the outcome of events. This thought that the observer is a source of action on the environment fills the need to see this cycle of space and matter to take place at our event horizons where observation is not possible. Is this the leap of faith that is required to understand our universe?
If it is then we can begin to talk about the membrane that is the space and time field loop that you find talked about on my site.
http://unit-unity-community.com
John