Quote:
Originally Posted by everymansmedium 
I am aware that this thought can never be anything but speculation in the eyes of the physics community.
The reason for this is that it indicates creation, and the concept of creation is non-deterministic. Thus resulting in a paradox of understanding.
Because of this, it will be necessary to wait until quantum physics realizes that the observation that they have already indicated as a CAUSE, of change, resulting in the many worlds theory and other thoughts to explain this phenomena, is exactly the same phenomena that I speak of here in this document.
John
|
This is just a heads up for the Saturday chat.
Relative to this thought. I might consider a topic of:
"Is observation a cause?"
More precisely this question is stated:
When superposition collapses into a specifically defined state, is this change THE RESULT OF, Quantum measurement/observation?
OR IS IT:
Coincidentally at the exact moment of the quantum measurement/observation?
If you believe that it is coincidental, what then do you believe the probabilities are that it is the result of a random occurrence coinciding with observation 100% of the time.
Note this is meant to be a verbal discussion of this thought
John.