Theory of Everything - View Single Post - On The Development of a Theory of The Universe

Felix Schrodinger · **Re: On The Development of a Theory of The Universe -** 03-31-2008, 04:38 AM

Hi Joseph

Seems to have gone a little quiet so lets see if we can stir things up again. My previous posts on this thread concerned WP duality and uncertainty but I wanted to question your assumption of the BB. Can you, or any other BB devotee, explain the difference between the single singularity - i.e. the source of the BB, and the series of smaller singularities which we all accept - i.e. the black holes at the centre of each galaxy?

The formation of the galaxies is not explained by the (very) minor differences in the strength of the CBR as it would exhibit extremely high variations in the vicinity of those galaxies. Nor can they be explained by the expansion principle as the CBR would be graded. Overall the current BB paradigm is severely difficient when it comes to an explanation of their existence and relative consistency. The 'observed' expansion of the universe is much more likely to be a property of light related to the distance travelled than an accelarating expansion.

Assuming that most of the hard work done on the math and description of BHs is OK, is it reasonable to assume that we did not have one BB but actually have many - one at the centre of each galaxy? The C4 documentary 'Master of the Universe' which documents SH's life, confirmed that this alternative model is now acceptable. The only thing missing is for main-line science to realise that a (relatively) steady state universe is now an acceptable alternative to a single BB with a ready made explanation for the formation of the galaxies.

I will post this in my own TOE (The Dance of Shiva) shortly which also contains a proposed explanation for the mechanism of time.

regards
Felix

	(#50 (permalink))
Felix Schrodinger 1st degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 210 Thanks Given: 134 Thanked 28x in 25 Posts Join Date: Jan 2008 Rep Power: 5	Re: On The Development of a Theory of The Universe - 03-31-2008, 04:38 AM Hi Joseph Seems to have gone a little quiet so lets see if we can stir things up again. My previous posts on this thread concerned WP duality and uncertainty but I wanted to question your assumption of the BB. Can you, or any other BB devotee, explain the difference between the single singularity - i.e. the source of the BB, and the series of smaller singularities which we all accept - i.e. the black holes at the centre of each galaxy? The formation of the galaxies is not explained by the (very) minor differences in the strength of the CBR as it would exhibit extremely high variations in the vicinity of those galaxies. Nor can they be explained by the expansion principle as the CBR would be graded. Overall the current BB paradigm is severely difficient when it comes to an explanation of their existence and relative consistency. The 'observed' expansion of the universe is much more likely to be a property of light related to the distance travelled than an accelarating expansion. Assuming that most of the hard work done on the math and description of BHs is OK, is it reasonable to assume that we did not have one BB but actually have many - one at the centre of each galaxy? The C4 documentary 'Master of the Universe' which documents SH's life, confirmed that this alternative model is now acceptable. The only thing missing is for main-line science to realise that a (relatively) steady state universe is now an acceptable alternative to a single BB with a ready made explanation for the formation of the galaxies. I will post this in my own TOE (The Dance of Shiva) shortly which also contains a proposed explanation for the mechanism of time. regards Felix