[Bob Campbell]

One could not argue that a theory of everything concerns how experience is unified, in other words how it has a Oneness to it. But that does not mean that everything must be explained. It need only mean that there is a universal structure to the diversity of experience that recurrs in every aspect of experience. In other words there is an isomorphy to the structure of experience that is common to us all. And we need at least some degree of structural insight into how experience is organized in order to cope in this world. A TOE then, need only have an insight into the universal nature of structure, that is, into the cosmic order. This can hardly be an academic mathematical theory about strings or whatever. It must show how experience is organized and integrated. The final insight of Oness may be a personal one, and mute, but this also does not mean that we cannot explore the dynamics of how things work.

Originally Posted by michael kirkpatrick

how can one explain all,maybe,the theory of everything,is,really,about,one
thing,in whom we live and move and have our being.Maybe from one thing
comes everything,and seeing all these different manifestations,we become
confused.

If there is such a thing as a final answer to all,I think it will be very simple,
so much so that a child,could understand it.

I once asked a question from a wise old man,thinking that I could trick
him,and also show him how clever I was.The question I asked was,
how many forms of life are there in the universe,his reply astounded
me,without stopping to think he said,there is only One form of life
in this universe,expressed in an infinite number of ways.

surely then,words,like,love,light,energy,strings,consciou sness,are all interchangable,and really the same. regards michael.