Hi Graham, TY for the clarification, and for being into such details.
Relax and no fuss really, .... apples to oranges but both are fruit provided what forwarded are not bogus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett  uh oh what did i do now ...
apples to oranges but both are fruit! |
That video demonstrated a dynamo driven by free energy,
that's true, and your observation that it accelerates therefore is not a transference factor, this is also valid.
In that video it claims that overunity for magnetism is proven;
this is a myth. You should know it by now what drives it, and that inertial force is self explanatory.
It also claims that the technology is patented, and therefore magnetic overunity is scientifically recognized;
this is a pesudo truth driven by the myth that feedbacks the support to the claim.
It purports that when the method to harness free energy with this dynamo is perfected in due course, like how computers has improved in all aspect in many generations over time, massed produced to reduce cost, etc, the potential of that gadget to its extend of generating free energy is up to your imaginations.
This is an infalsifiable big picture that is very seductive. However, this is a delusion with foresights build on a basis founded in an illusion of knowing and the illusion of having control. What a paradox!
“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” - Galileo Galilei
That dynamo will slow to a halt if you even try to power a small led of miniscular electrical load, and even build that to the best efficiency possible by the size of an average Canadian house, at most it could power up a high efficiency light bulb made with leds for a small study room . The electricity it save would not pay for even a small fraction of the interest incurred to build that dynamo, among there will be other problems it would create.
Faraday's MHD disc dynamo without moving parts is at least more credible, though also not practical.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett what caught my attention on the site was the words he stated that the florescent lights were effecting the three static anti clockwise magnets on the outer. So i gave it another thought or two. The movement of the whole thingy being lifted showed no sound variation as might even on that small level where there is gravity to the static mags bearings etal CD drive bearings of the plate indicative of a micro current use .. but thats not here and now ..
This directional vectoring of the force I thought may be in view with a nano tec thought with the hanging magnet experiment you mentioned on your site "inertial force" and a sort of and i say again sort of 1st generation of my sandwiched field vectoring of a multi formed field. Again just the mechanics of form composition needed to make the arms my concern and in his case a use of varied spinning field on an axis at different points of a central field ... he may be using a motor in there lol but he has a hobby i believe in "robotic wars" so is quite inventive in nature where i dismissed that thought to see the acceleration factor, and cannot picture a transference factor.
apples to oranges but both are fruit!
my theorem to get the fields direction right for the torque and simple construction involves the casting of possibly two non interactive materials that will interact with each own having a positive or negative pole but non interacting with the other surface as may be in the transitional fluid state of forces theorem form out there ... or as predominant fields keeping them far enough away from each other using a two arm system ... or forming the surfaces of the arm in the stasis form of the arm in such angled form as to be interactive with the stationary predominate N1N2 fields or spinning/wobbling varied to change N1 axis to the N2 axis and both to initial axis before compression. or as further given you the model showing the arm as a plate having the composition of fluid particle form in transition more like out there ... and or the N1N2 spinning to take it another step however the shape might be still staying predominant mass/fluid/energy/force .... there are multi variations as the pics at your site gives rise to my speculations ... Particle beam emissions, the jet ... could be a side effect to the mechanical compression of the fields even on a small nano model as purposed with no wobble or with the wobble? I don't know and did not want to go there yet for obvious reasons of a personal nature to use in the super accelerators that can be built now a days? Maybe the jet would accelerate transitional particle form ... ? The shape field construction the only concern? Yea i know that is really really out there in paradox to to a lot of science but to some and learning ? Who knows and I will not argue it. I am not one to deny scientific calculation but based on new discoveries every day making the rethinking open ended this is my drummer ... progressive, accelerating and the speed of light is not enough! |
.... (see no period!) That should be the way to pursue and investigate.
after thought is I have an egotistical manner of reflection and projection at times, sorry it is the way... Non of this, you are perfectly alright.
For conciousness, for understanding and for unity.
Best regards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett There is a symmetry to it all, a pattern, and when it is conceptional perceived, what then? We move on to enjoy it, and i do not think we were the first nor will be the last come to think of it! I am beginning to empathize with it more and more ... just what is it? I have to see it all sort of thing an refuse to limit the process (see no period!)
after thought is I have an egotistical manner of reflection and projection at times, sorry it is the way I am burdened with the mirror. Please by all means be blunt ... Michael keeps me in line at times saying KISS 'keep it simple stupid!' NOT said here sir to you ... Ty Michael! (i forget if i said that to him before.)
~Peace! "unified"(I like that word) Graham. |