Hi Allen,
Glad to hear that the topics has also struck a chord in you, and I also thank you for your heartfelt respond.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoPpAScience  Hi Vincent,
I have been reading posts in forums like this one since forums began, and you are the first poster to spark my imagination again, and I like to thank you for this. |
"Quarks" might exist in vortex motion... I am with all ears.
I saw your post making apology to NOBODY, I was very touched by your gesture, it was so sincere, so genuine and so powerful and it moves one's emotion. It would take alot of cultivation to be able to make such a move that was simply great. Thanks for showing that beauty and also showing me that post.
Sound like you are picturing metaphysics through visualizing vortex dynamics in the universe, I would love to hear it from you when you are done organizing and writing it.
Best regards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoPpAScience [While I was on the road driving this week, I was thinking very hard about how to reply to your posts, and about how rare a "Logical Mind" is, when for the first time in over a decade I was once again thinking where I never thought before. While I was thinking about how to express my feelings to you about how 'quarks' might exist in vortex motion, that I came to the thought, that the physical universe is only physical because of vortexual motion.
The 'vortex' being the mechanism needed, for "adding speed and mass to area", thous giving substance to an "unnoticeable universe".
I still have not found time to read your web site, but hope to over the next few days and look forward to see what your site can add to my thinking processes. |