View Single Post
G_burnett
7th degree Black Belt

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,154
Blog Entries: 1
28 G_burnett has much to be proud ofG_burnett has much to be proud ofG_burnett has much to be proud ofG_burnett has much to be proud ofG_burnett has much to be proud ofG_burnett has much to be proud of
Quote  
04-02-2008, 01:21 PM
Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo View Post
Hi all, the animation for Antarctica Ozone Hole is finally up showing its rotation in one lunar cycle.



Animation shows the Antarctica Ozone Hole rotation is associated with polar vortex (In white circle marked by NASA that refreshes on daily intervals), in an Earth-moon precession cycle covering one lunar cycle from 14/09/2004 to 14/10/2004, starting form beginning of a new moon phase to the next new moon phase. The shades in orange and red color are regions with high concentration of ozone that were vertically cumulated.

For anyone who wants to try figuring out in details the rotating directions with moon relative to Earth and the Antarctica Ozone Hole, have to take note there are several very tricky paradoxes involved. Firstly, this view is looking above South Pole with Earth fixated, so moon would apparently rotates CCW, secondly, the precession cycle itself is also paradoxical, the axis of suspended Antarctica Ozone Hole rotation is rotating in opposite direction by precession of the moon's orbit; this is very mind boggling. While gravity of moon will exert the strongest induced precession on Antarctica Ozone Hole, other solar system objects, such as Sun and other planets would also have exerted perturbation to it that causes those less apparent but odd behaviors.

The rotation of ozone hole was evidently affected in a precession cycle of Earth-moon, its maximum ozone hole size was affected by focused gravities of a solar system alignment, it has a super freezing sunken cold core that displaces the ozone layer, the regions with high concentration of ozone that were vortically culmulated, all these are supporting evidence that ozone hole is caused by the polar vortex of stratosphere.

In the southern hemisphere, the intensity of polar vortex, the speed of polar jet stream and the polar stratospheric clouds associated with ozone hole, were usually at maximum in winter nights. Ozone hole usually developed in August till November on yearly basis was also synchronized with polar vortex presence during the same period. These synchronization suggest a direct link for the two events are also supporting evidence that ozone hole is caused by a polar vortex of stratosphere.

For Arctic Polar Vortex at the North Pole, the higher density troposphere air mass at lower altitude is blocked by land masses of mountain ranges that would act like brakes, dragging on air movement that wound also reduce the momentum of polar vortex at stratosphere. This would reduce the intensity of the Arctic Polar Vortex, as a result an ozone hole of significant scale at the North Pole has never occurred . Most of human activities that damages ozone layer were at northern hemisphere, but ozone hole has occurred only at the South Pole. The weak intensity of Arctic polar vortex and therefore a relatively unaffected Arctic ozone layer is also a supporting evidence that ozone hole is caused by polar vortex of stratosphere.

All the above findings based on singular vortex mechanism are the supporting evidence that ozone hole is caused by polar vortex of stratosphere.

With the supporting statements from NASA that Antarctica Ozone Hole has direction connections to polar vortex, supported with satellite images of Antarctica Ozone Hole as the scientific evidence, it is now apparent that the claim of Universal Vortical Singularity for Antarctica Ozone Hole is caused by polar vortex of stratosphere has the scientific proof on hand.

Any idea, comment or suggestion is most welcome.
hi again Vincent

I have to look at this a bit closer but may have covered what I could say in referencing the inner core of the earth being fluid and having irregular amt of mass form by outside forces simular to the nucleus of an atom, i mean who says the comparison has to be a hydrogen atom?

and i will look at this regards the possible indication in such variance the poles could change soon? I doubt though there would be enough information calculable from what we have but for the algebra minded it may pose a good quest I for one would like to hear the result of.

~ Peace! unified Graham
Reply With Quote
G_burnett is offlineReport Post
 
Online Loans | J J Benitez | Bad Credit Loan | Verizon Ringtones | Credit Cards