View Single Post
Re: The Probabilty of C
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
MJA
7th degree Black Belt
MJA is a jewel in the roughMJA is a jewel in the rough
 
MJA's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,079
Thanks Given: 155
Thanked 128x in 109 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep Power: 18
   
Re: The Probabilty of C - 04-03-2008, 11:31 AM

[quote=everymansmedium;50949]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA View Post
Hello MJA:
It has nothing to do with any of the above thoughts. It has to do with making a good measurement.

Resolution plus stability = accuracy.

(Stability = + or -) a fluctuation in terms of the
resolution = (what can be resolved)

The wave is simply much more stable (repeatable) so is used as the method indicated as the standard method to measure C.
This is very basic metrology. It is also why Dave as a metrologist gets frustrated when the basics of his profession are not understood.
John.
Obviously to measure something, one must know what that something is, right?
So John, to accurately measure light, you must know what light is.
What is light?
Dave, your an expert as John says, maybe you can shedd some light on light for me, please.
Is light an object of measurable simplicity that I am flailing to grasp, or is it more fair to say, no one has completely grasped light yet?
Do tell!

=
MJA


The truth of everything is less than one inch,
it is only equal and the lion is one.
One is free when the door is opened,
education has the key.
=
  
Reply With Quote