Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo  Dear Garham, very well said. However, what is your thought on that great power will always be met with great responsibility? Before some sort of great awakening can the self-centred human behaviour such as greed be contained? Lets say your dynamo design can work and economy sustainable for mass production, what make you think it is absolutely compatible with nature's plan? Have you ever consider that this might ultimately cause more harm than good for humanity? And repeat that footstep of Mr. E you still cannot forgive?
These questions are raised because I thought you might have some insights or perhaps even the answers, for you have been consciously aware of that and I would be most wanting to hear and gather some pointers from you.
Just to illustrate some points, here is an excerpt from my web page on paradoxical illusions: California bush fire - The burn of the century
Al Nino effect was blamed for a California bush fire that had raged for weeks and reduced everything to ashes in its wake, in the disaster thousands of houses were lost and many firefighters were among those who have perished in this burn of the century.
A scientific investigation suggested there was a more fundamental cause that had evolved into this monster. Over the years relentlessly, human seems to have overcome nature in its spontaneous bush fires, by enforcing legislation and have had strict measures to suppress all fires quickly to control their spread. However, the successful measures for decades resulted in massive cumulating of combustible materials, heavily stacked by fallen branches, leaves and the likes, layers over layers added on over the years. With the arrival of Al Nino effect affecting climate in a perfectly prepared situation, with a cue probably initiated by lightning strikes, the forest was burned with huge towering fires never witnessed before in history that could not be suppressed, raged for weeks that everything the community have been guarding over many decades were all helplessly up in smokes.
The firefighters thought they knew every aspect of fire, they don't, in all those years they thought they have the situations in control, that was also an illusion. For this case, it took the awe of nature for us to wake up from the paradoxes of our delusions, and realize the real culprit for this burn of the century; our ignorant.
“Nature is relentless and unchangeable, and it is indifferent as to whether its hidden reasons and actions are understandable to man or not.” - Galileo Galilei
Hindsight is always perfect, but can you see it before it is done?
Best regards, |
4:32 AM
Hi Vincent, best regards back for sure;
Very good point to rise. I have a post to do on the other thread that may be better here then and will decide to post maybe a bit later.
Paradox reasoning is from what I define as coming from mind sets based on self determined need, by incomplete conception/perception, of what is "input" made manifest to the persona.
If ones self polished perfect mirror is too clouded by its containment of incomplete data then you will input incomplete partial data stream and reflect less and be seeing less to rational thought and hence project less then needed to a given task.
This mind set failure to do the right thing develops through the lack of the self investigation of truth and please you guys do not come off with the there is no such thing as truth arguments as I speak of the "process compared to being a follower."
In the case of the fires one had a rationalized need to stop all fires. The result was calculated in someone answering the question where does brotherhood lie in a majority form of petition to a power holder. I subscribe to the old adage some things are worth contemplating when asked to join the purported mind set need projected being I a firm believer in the self investigating of truth idiom. ... and the only answer to further depiction of need must be the same some things are worth contemplating ... and then do what has to be done … there is more to that from the north of the Yellow river I would like to hear again.
The one that made the decision to stop all fires could have had many variables that effected the persona decision to sign on and act such as politics or personal gain and false rationalizations of going with the masses as they are always right and this come with the authoritative figure ego and vanity of persona based again on mind set in the learned rote people follow the authoritarian figure without question as a matter of learned rote from childhood.
The pathways are formed so early and yet have I seen one institution that teaches outside that framework.
Mr. E was aware that Germany was developing there own program.
Communications in the circle are always there were and will be.
He did what had to be done in his empathy to the human condition but gave it to the wrong persona and to evaluation for use.
Hindsight being that the power at hand could have been shown to the enemy in a do as I say or else and this was not done over a non populated area for example.
No, there was a personal agenda and this did not happen.
Could E have said I will give you this to be used like this and then set out the rules?
No because he had mind set that gave credence to the good in man will be the rule used.
It was not.
The Rule of Law subject was one of his later only subjects he really gave letter too after the events. After the events on a personal level I too like the subject very much.
And still there is no real rule of law applied to the formula and applicable to the newer findings using it. There is no keeper of the light Vincent that is known to all. But there are keepers of the light. We can understand that I think and maybe others will here to.
All over all the time everywhere I can feel the human condition, empathize with it all, identify with it even to the movement through space at 6700 miles and hour spinning about a thousand more and beyond but without rule of law applied it is nothing I dare touch.
How can we apply rule of law to a development? You have a keeper. The sage persona has always been the keeper. I will blog the other on your other thread.
Get rid of the idea of all these government identities having meaning in this. Deal I say with the individual and with the rule of law that will see what is given not misused. Good term paper project that subject to give to students’ maybe.
Ethics 101, Assignment One, 5000 words, citations expected to all examples given.
“There is an item that will benefit all but only for good so how can you protect it from falling into the wrong hands?”
You give it to the individual in mass. Hording not allowed by the way it is made available looking at Cuba giving the cell phone use now to the population for an example of why hording never works and should not be done. DELL is dumping in Western Canada and near anyone can get a new laptop with all the bells and whistles. I have one now TY.
The Oil companies are hording and it is such an audacity to my human personae right now I want to give cell phones to everyone ... sort of thing.
If a government came to me right now with the rules laid out on use I would give it all ...its not here or there ... they can, have, great organization skills, once in a while. I have to go and do not want to lose my blog will cut and paste and be back soon.
4:07 pm
So yes the first questioned answered is yes: it can be contained by individual one on one interaction with the person in need. Example in point is the service of giving to mothers in need all over the world since WW II of dairy cows. The rule is that they in turn breeding the cow will give one away in turn.
Over a Million cows are given so far.
Question two. The direction of thought has always been to me to use what nature has given us and that is not to say manufacturing the energy but in recognition of the energy and turning its direction. Not speeding it up or adding to it or making something look like it … just changing its direction as needed … is reflecting light with the mirror where it should enlighten in stead of turning on a bulb. Any success along these lines to date and there are a few, have been accidental in event. The safety factor to the whole is then met and it is easier, just using it.
Then of course here we are speaking of this in public forum, do I break the rule? Yes. The circle is always there qui?
“What now do you want to do?” ask the God.
“You have destroyed the endeavours of countless thousands that have will and plan to have … what can I do?”
“Learn.” seethe the God. “Do what has to be done now less it is countless millions more I destroy.”
“Is there another way?”
“Yes,” the sympathetic God spoke, “ but if I give you it all, without mystery, it is usage not development, and such would be a sin, and billions will never enjoy life my child! Stagnation will breed entropy! Think of this.”
“But, but …”
“GO!” The clouds roared out and the seas thundered and a great light shone down to the path and the sage went on his way.
Author unknown.
Peace! ~ !Unity, Graham (or Garham as you put it either way, I have been called worse.)