Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger  Masons are described in my TOE article 'The Dance of Shiva'. They are my equivalent of the Higgs Boson except that they are the source of the strings which make up matter rather than creating mass by reacting with the strings.
|
Felix,
This is fun.
Can you expand on a few things for me, then? What's the difference?
Strings --> Higgs --> particles
Strings + Higgs (like your Masons) --> particles
or
(Your) Masons --> Strings --> particles
(Your) Masons (like Higgs) + Strings --> particles
Are you just giving a new name to the Higgs?
And why use the name "Masons" for your hypothetical 'actor' when it already has an existing workable definition in use at present in the standard model for a family of particle types.
----------------
Quote from Felix :
"I don't see the connection with the weak force but the gravity issue is close to my own thinking. IMO BHs consist of a concentrated block of masons which have reabsorbed their associated gravitons. This would take up all of the empty space, as you describe, but much more as the gravitational field would not exist inside the BH. If the right circumstances occur, then a dramatic expansion back into the real world would happen just as you postulate."
----------------------------------------
No GRAVITATIONAL FIELD inside of a black hole? Please explain what this means.
What can you tell us about these "gravitons" of which you speak. Since, none have been ever detected, exactly what do
you think they are and how big are they, how energetic, what do they do, how do they
do whatever it is that they do? How do they interact with matter. Are they fast or slow or a function of space/time somehow ala Einstein?
Tom Van Flandern thinks that he can show that Gravity acts at a speed that is 2x10^10 c. That's a lot of magnitudes faster than the speed of light. I don't think that he is right, because if gravity operated at that velocity, there would be some evidence of things traveling, drawn along by that gravity, to be much faster than light speed, but there isn't.
Re; the Weak Force of Black Holes---
I was only referring to the classical definition of the force responsible for the radioactive decay of "heavy" atoms. In my view heavy atoms are that way because they are more compressed, therefore under much more internal subatomic "pressures." Of course the other forces would be in there as well but, it will be the tendency to decay --the Weak Force--that will cause the Black Hole to eventually begin to reverse its "gravity" and vent or explode or "shine" once again. The Weak Force should grow stronger as the Black Hole grows in proportion to the other forces to eventually be dominant enough to overpower the 'other' forces. As evident by the fact that the denser an element the greater the Weak Force and the decay rate.
But check out Tom's gravity ''theory" and tell me what
you think about it.
Regards, Aaron
Van Flandern's paper on v of c.
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp