View Single Post
Re: Any Clues from Mother Nature's Boundaries?
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
G_burnett
6th degree Black Belt
G_burnett is a splendid one to beholdG_burnett is a splendid one to beholdG_burnett is a splendid one to beholdG_burnett is a splendid one to beholdG_burnett is a splendid one to behold
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 977
Thanks Given: 660
Thanked 416x in 309 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rep Power: 22
   
Re: Any Clues from Mother Nature's Boundaries? - 04-04-2008, 02:34 PM

Hi there, very good questions.

"What can we make of nature’s occasional revelations that scientists make note of, but may go no further with. Are they telling us something remarkable about reality?"Unquote.

If they made it that simple they would be out of a job.


"Planck length — What happens, if anything, inside the Plank distance? Is there another reality there?"Unquote.

Relative to what reality?

"Size — Is there a limit to how large or how small things can be?"Unquote.

Relative to what, may be the real quest ion.

"Dreams — Why does the reality of night dreams match that of waking reality? Does this mean reality is projected?" Unquote.

Yes but try to prove it to someone other then yourself.

"Speed of Light — Why is it limited?" Unquote

Who told you that garbage?

"Eternal Substance — How come it is a specific particular thing that works, as opposed to something that didn’t? Whether it manifested from possibility or was always there, what decided its form? Is it like the quantum world suggests, the most probable of all possibilities?" Unquote.

I have a rocks picked up on the ocean shore and the rock forms shows a picture of our own perception of existence ... one a human being with a dog in his arms, maybe a sheep and over the head of the animal a clear hand with fingers in a blessing. the mans head looking up and with a halo seems to be looking at the white crystal dots on a dark black background as we might look to the stars. ... i do not think then that we are the most probable of all possibilities as the rock was formed millions of years be for man and may have just been a notation sketch book thingy of a higher force ... paradox indeed.

"No time like the present — Why does time seem to go so fast when we use the internet? And why does it seem to go so slow in grade school? I used to purposely not look at the clock for a long time in school so that it would have a chance to leap ahead, but it never did. But while on the internet I lit up a cigarette and it seemed to burn out in a matter of seconds." Unquote.

The relativity of time is paradox to the sentient persona trying to look at the watch, the human piece of thingy we created to measure the space between tax returns, ignore it.

"Living Forever — Perhaps someday humans will live forever, barring fatal accidents. What would be the implications of that? DNA rips at the ends when it divides and replicates 50 times or so during our lives, limiting the damage to junk DNA until that is all gone and our good DNA deteriorates. It is not that simple to fix, but could we just add more junk at the ends and live forever? Not that we wouldn’t break something else by doing so, but suppose it worked eventually." unquote

It is to my understanding that we only replicate 3 times but have the capability to do so 50. An elephant has the capability to do it 300 times. The simple fix is.

"Everything connected — If everything is connected to everything, as suggested by quantum entanglement, is this a kind of “perception” that we can use?[/quote]" unquote

Depends if you are a word thinker scribbling dots in varied organization to some inner preference or learned rote or if you see pictures.

Peace! ~ Graham.
  
Reply With Quote