Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo 
“Nature is relentless and unchangeable, and it is indifferent as to whether its hidden reasons and actions are understandable to man or not.” - Galileo Galilei[/color]
Hindsight is always perfect, but can you see it before it is done?
Best regards, |
A13+
I am not ready yet to leave the ethics thing here yet. I wrote a colligate level term paper on the subject and where others were given a 10 min forum at the end of the year the Prof gave me the whole 90 minutes at the podium.
The concept of ethical gathering has to have the definition of having been gathered in an ethical manner or the use of thereafter can not be done by any involved in the gather that might want to make a judgement call based on the gather.
I used the German WWII camp testing done of varied human form to see how long they could survive in frigid temperatures, basically they were put into a freezer naked and froze to death at varied temperatures and the information was then used to the conditions on the Russian front.
If today the information was used would it be proper to do so?
Interesting was that the class of varied personas an even high end occupations all had the idea voiced adamantly or by silent non committal waiting that yes it should be used if it meant you could save a life …. And I replied sternly NO,
You could not base your judgement on the information because it was acquired in an unethical manner and there being it untrustworthy to judge a set of circumstances and come out with a positive effect and the information had to be censored, tossed out of the equation.
Go sit in a courtroom sometime and see the censor by the Judge there taking place.
Now on the other hand we to continue with apples.
Once a decision is made (as you state not so to have hindsight later_) that a judgement must be made … reread that, and then “take your best guess baby.”
That is all one can do, honestly, it boils down to the human consciousness. It is who we are. Human is the term most applied.
And this process is called doing what has to be done. It is called being a responsible identity unto it all, ethical, but not for self. There is a difference. If it does not work out you did your best and face the consequences or the glory if it does, humbly.
But once a decision of need manifest must be addressed and one does nothing in an insult to who you are, then the insult and wrong is to the all.
Many things indeed are worth contemplating Vincent. That is why I let you use the term dynamo maybe hem hem.
I hope this helps …
For unity indeed, ~Peace! Graham