Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Mohan;
Franklin’s concept is similar to a concept of a Serbian physicist that worked at CERN in the mid 1990’s. That concept also claimed that all atomic and subatomic matter were constructs of electrons. I do agree that this is a very viable interpretation of existing data but not that it is a fundamental. I like both concepts as they are presented but my interpretations of current data explains how electrons can convert to positrons and also quarks; it also explains what we call forces and fields. Nature’s magic act is nothing more than pure physical interactions; no extra entities of forces nor fields. |
Interactions between what?
What are your interpretations could you give me a hint(or a link)?