View Single Post
David Maes
I'm thinking thus I exist

David Maes's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 487
17 David Maes has disabled reputation
Quote  
08-28-2005, 12:08 PM
I agree more with Marketa... (I could be wrong of course...)

Actually... Suppose you have thermal energy... Can this energy think??
Can it feel?? I don't think so... I think it's just the sorting of these little bits of information in time (which our brain does) which gives us consciousness...
and our feelings... and our perceptions...

I think something like thermal energy just follows the laws of fysics...

I think our brain also does, but we're not aware of it.
Of course a brain works 'parallel'. This means it's not like a personal computer.
It converts millions and millions of bits information AT THE SAME TIME!
Than it choses the best information or solution and 'troughs away' the information it doesn't need anymore to the unconsciousness (which is the 'recycle bin' of our brain...! The 'recycle bin' is fragmentated!

This leads to what we call 'free will' or we can make a choice; (of course it's still our brain which makes a choice!) And these processes are still following the laws of fysics!!

I only dout about one thing... It's holography!!

You know what a holographic picture is. I don't know much about it... but it seems that the a lightbeem which reflects on a holographic picture would contain a whole picture 'like a tree for example'. If this is the truth; it meens that a single lightbeem could actually contain lots of information!!
(I don't really believe it; but I don't really know much about holography)...

What about the EPR-paradox?... Maybe one foton actually can send information to another foton breaking with relativity and lokal causality.
(Relativity could still be wrong...)
Of course you can say that non-lokality does not exist because of the subjectivity (which says that a quantumobject only exist when you're perceiving it)

The information that one foton would send to another foton would go faster than light. We haven't perceived such information yet by experiments...

But... If you look back to the past... many theories are completed changed or are proven to be wrong... Maybe relativity is wrong????
(or at least not completely correct)
(Of course still with all respect for Einstein; who was a million times smarter than me (I'm more the avarage); but Einstein was also human)

For example look at the past hundred years: first we knew that light contains several wavelenghts (ROGGBIV), than they discovered other ones, like radiowaves, röntgenwaves, infrared, UV, gammawaves, microwaves, ...

WHAT IF THERE WERE OTHER WAVES WE HAVEN'T DISCOVERED YET?

What if those waves could break the borders of time and space and lokal causality; and travel to the past???

We don't know everything! We know a bit, but very very very little...

(The thing is, whit a very little bit of information, you can have very much power; for example the atomic bomb; of course to distroy 'the force' you would have to know everything!!)

I think we're a little naieve to think we could know everything now (people have always thought they knew everything, even in the past...)!!

(Of course I could be wrong)

Edison once said... 'If there would be an afterlife; these should be waves... and we should be able somehow to recieve those waves on some kind of medium...)

Of course... we have lots of theories about waves and little particals....

But what if there were an afterlife, of which the information we can not recieve with our brain???

Is the afterlife containing waves....

(Oh God, again I don't know anything anymore.........)
Reply With Quote
David Maes is offlineReport Post
 
Debt Consolidation | The eBay Song | Bad Credit Mortgages | Notebook Deals | Cash ISA