[PoPpAScience]

Hi austin:

Glad that I awakened your previous interests. I read your thread, and see that you were in the same ball park as me. I see you using the word potential throughout, but prefer "possibility". I sure wish I seen your thread before, it would have not been short lived. I hope I can advance your interests even more here.

First I like to say that in describing the start of all there is, and what there was before this universe, we can only use words of today to get our thoughts across. I have tried to use the words that best describe the "Action" I am thinking about.

Take "Potential" for starters. I thought very hard about what is the one thing that I can say was absolutely at the start of this universe, that could be argued for. "Potential" is what stood out in my mind the strongest, because after all we are here, and that means that there absolutely had to be, "Potential" in the beginning.

When it came to describing the "Action" of "Aware" popping out of the paradoxical nature of "Potential". I had to think of what could come out of "Potential", that had its same nature. What I visualized was, an "Idea". An "Idea" has both of the paradoxical natures of "Potential". An "Idea" is made of 'nothing', and yet is 'something'.

Next there had to be an opening for this 'nothing something' "Idea" to pop through. I thought of a '0-dimensional point' as the best description. From the instance this '0-dimensional point' popped open, I thought that the "Idea" of "Aware" had to moved in upon itself, fore it had no where to move out into. I was not comfortable with it popping into a medium of "Potential".

It took a few years to think of how this "Idea" of "Aware", could move in upon itself from a '0-dimensional point'. Then one day while looking at the equation for the volume of a sphere it hit me, that if I added a negative sign to (r^3) in the equation, that maybe instead of expanding out into a medium, it could instead expand in upon itself. This worked for me because, if I looked at it from the point of view that everything is relative to the viewer, then "Aware" being the only viewer, expanding in upon itself would be only relative to "Aware". The equation might not work in everyday math, but the thought of it does.

The best way I can describe this falling upon itself, is to imagine if you where standing in a sphere of say 6 feet in circumference. Now if you where to shrink, to say one billion billion times smaller, when you stop shrinking, would not your perspective change from being in a small sphere, to a very large one? This is how I envision "Aware" falling in upon itself into 'infinity' for 'eternity'.

In summary to this point; From the great 'nothing something' of "Paradox of Potential", an "Idea" of "Aware" popped through a 0-dimensional point that became a sphere relative in size only to the view of the viewer, "Aware".

Then came my best thought yet, and that was "Aware" having the "Will" to stop its fall into 'infinity for 'eternity'. This made "Aware" cognitive of its being. From there "Aware" took the long evaluational path, that lead to us thinking about the beginning. Us, the same "Aware" as in the beginning, in manifested form.

This part of my theory I feel very comfortable about, the rest is a work in progress. I have always hoped that I could have conversations about the period between the "Singularity" of "Will", and the sciences of today. Maybe this might happen soon.

I hope this adds more to your interests austin.