Thread: Pentaism/Hexism
View Single Post
Pentaism/Hexism
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Fredrick
4th degree Black Belt
Fredrick will become famous soon enoughFredrick will become famous soon enoughFredrick will become famous soon enoughFredrick will become famous soon enough
 
Fredrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 469
Thanks Given: 20
Thanked 29x in 29 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 20
   
Pentaism/Hexism - 04-13-2008, 04:32 PM

In this thread, I'd like to deliver the definitive theory of everything as being based on pentaism which includes an empty spot (=six spots, five contents). If you know me from postings on other threads, I obviously cannot do it alone: I need your help!

I claim to have scientific information, yet the nature of the empty spot (and of nothing) makes it difficult to convince others of the truth of pentaism. But what opponents mainly use to undermine this delivery is basically claiming I have nothing that can be qualified as scientific. Yet irony of ironies, nothing is exactly what I deliver. So, what I deliver to create the pentaist theory is used to undermine the theory, in effect they are declaring the theory valid while actually trying to invalidate it. That's the main problem I encounter: those who reject pentaism do so on the grounds of pentaism.

Basically, I am asking your help to have pentaism be recognized as a toe (either as the toe or at least one of the toes). The web page http://www.pentapublishing.com/Math.html provides the information to substantiate pentaism. Can you help?


The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not.
  
Reply With Quote