Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Welcome to ToeQuest Franklin;
Not bad; but like most others though, you are working within the framework of undefined or unexplained terms of physics; you need to take the final plunge and realize that the forces, the Aether, the electrons, the protons, the positrons and so on are not themselves fundamental; what they are made of is what’s fundamental and it is that entity that needs to be defined in terms of fundamental properties and attributes. It looks like you may have the right stuff to take it to that next level though.
Hope you enjoy the forum. |
What do you think is undefined or unexplained? I would have to agree that most every TOE postulates things that cannot be observed like strings, gravitons, quarks, etc. However, my TOE is unique in that it only relies on the existence of positrons and electrons and the electrostatic force - all of which we know exist. Now it is true that a positron and electron might not be fundamenttal and my TOE does not explain it further, but at least my TOE has a grounding in particles and forces that we know for a fact exist and we know their properties precisely - a considerable advantage over basing your TOE on things that we do not know exist.
For example, if I based a theory on the existence of apples, then everything I build on apples is valid because we know that apples exist and their properties. I might not know how apples come into existence or how they work, but as long as I only rely on properties that we can measure, this theory has a complete explanation in the area of its domain.
Of course I am still trying to figure out what a positron/electron is. My best guess is that it is a physical shell that rings with a resonant frequency.