[Tony Stanton]

Quanta07

I have read you pdf.

And I suppose that you think you have understood it straight away.

You begin by assuming a premise to be true…..

Of course I believe the premise that matter is responsible for spacetime is true otherwise there would be no point in researching that premise, would there?

Then proceed to use math drawn from illusions and reverse engineering to state that a ‘universal second’ is equal to a spherical VOLUME of radius ‘Ct’.

Illusions and reverse engineering? What are you babbling about? The radius of the zone of spacetime generated by any object is simply the distance that light travels in one second and I only use the second because physics uses that particular convention.

Then define the ‘universal clock’ in terms of LINEAR distance multiplied by the cube root of some number. Some really bad math here.

What bad math? The cube root of 299792548 m is not bad math. I suggest you take a course on simple geometry and algebra. It might help you to understand what is a simple concept, after all.

Matter does not radiate ‘spacetime’.

You don’t know that, you just assume that everything you have been taught about physics is true. If matter does radiate spacetime then it is testable in the lab. If I had access to a lab with the right facilities then I would prove that what I am saying is true.

Just because you severely want this to be true, does not make it so.

And I could say the same thing. Just because you want to think Einstein has spacetime correct doesn’t mean he does. I admit this concept is radical but the math I have used are correct and they show it is possible to model spacetime using this concept. Instead of coming up with some tinpot excuse to put this theory down try using the math and try understanding the theory then you might find a real flaw in the concept. I have spent many years trying to disprove the concept myself but TR always seems to come up with answers as to why we see the Universe as we do.

Any and all conclusions based on this false premise ….. are False.

You don’t know for sure it is a false premise. Although Einstein was a great man and a great thinker I believe his reluctance to tackle the arrow of time is why his conclusions were based on a false premise. TR explains the arrow of time and the presence of space. No other theory of spacetime does this.

Space and time are inseparable, but each is unique, NOT the same.

That is purely yours and the mainstreams opinion because it is what you have always been taught.

I find the presentational logic invalid and the math reverse engineered and incorrect.

But you have shown your math to be lacking and what you say about ‘math reverse engineering’ is absurd to say the least.

Tony