View Single Post
Re: 2008-04-19: What is Time?
Old
  (#42 (permalink))
analog
Ever Curious Soul
analog is a name known to allanalog is a name known to allanalog is a name known to all
 
analog's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 388
Thanks Given: 170
Thanked 224x in 131 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rep Power: 11
   
Re: 2008-04-19: What is Time? - 04-22-2008, 10:28 PM

Pat,

Thanks for your comments.

Dave and I have discussed some of these statements before. His comments, as well as Neutralino's, are always welcome and appreciated, as I respect both of their opinions.

I'm not a supporter of the Big Bang, as this would be more of a framework to explain "energy". I think percieved "energy" is due to the absolute motion of matter.

Anyway, thanks for the chat. See you around the forum.

P.S. Increments of time are measured as increments of motion, and the infinite potential comes from infinite absolute motion. Motion never ends, thus if we allow all fundamental matter to have equal velocities, their plank distance traveled, relative to each other, from frame to frame, can be equivalent to a plank measurement of time. Einstien's Relativity would come in when we accelerate a massive (more dense) formation of fundamental matter through a less dense medium of fundamental matter, whereby the internal frequency of the particles which made it up would increase/decrease relative to the change in velocity of the acceleration, due to absolute particle velocity. This would also increase/decrease its relative dimensions in accordance to the velocity of acceleration, being as size is relative to internal frequency.



Disclaimer: *The above statements are my opinion only and shouldn't be taken as factual. Read at your own risk*
  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to analog For This Useful Post:
Felix Schrodinger (04-23-2008), Profpat (04-22-2008)