Quote:
Originally Posted by neutralino 
I'm not talking about if or when the beggar is given money: I'm talking about a beggar sat, on the street with nothing. You cannot tell me that he has everything. Thus, the two are not equivalent.
|
It is only the ego's assumption to say .. that if a beggar sits on the street with nothing, he must therefore have nothing.
Perhaps this beggar is happy to have nothing, maybe for all we know ..his happiness lies in having nothing .. which is his equivalent to having everything.
But alas....
This is a new way of thinking .. please don't faint.
Also people if i say i love you .. please don't faint.
Simple isn't it.