Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA  I didn't invent the saying "Time flys when you having fun," but I sure have empirically experienced it, haven't you Dave?
What is the constant of time without the relativity of measure anyways?
Time is measure, isn't it?
You remove measure from time, and POOF! it's gone.
=
MJA |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat I now what you mean MJA, time goes by really fast when I.m having fun, ( BTW Einstein noticed this when he was with a beautiful woman ), and it seems to drag when I'm with my relatives. I wonder if that is Relative Time.Also I noticed as I get older time goes by a lot faster than when I was 8 years old. I think that is because when I was 8 a year was 1/8 of my life, now a year is only 1/62 of my life.Getting back to the twin going close to the speed of light he ages very slowly RELAtIVE to Earth time.Best to all,Pat |
Hello Pat and MJA,
To be able to relate consciousness/awarness to more than just the measurement of true time (motion), whereby we would imply that it affects it or allows for its existence, we would have to also make consciousness/awarness a quantisized entity at the fundamental level of interactions, thus giving it the role of directing every fundamental interaction, whereby all fundamental interactions know how to take place, as if telling two spheres of matter what to do when they collide. Rather than attributing this to geometry, we would be implying that fundamental consciousness governs geometric interactions. I'm still thinking on this one, as I am trying to bring life into a universal system whose interactions appear to not need it.
Otherwise, consciousness/awarness would merely allow for us to measure increments of motion, and the fundamental motions of matter, that give rise to time and form our world, would take place no matter if we were measuring (aware of) them or not. Either way we look at it, it will still happen as it should. My first definition would just imply how consciousness arises as fundamental interactions become more dense within a given volume of space.
As for the twins, Pat, the real question, in my mind, lies not in why or how their bodies age, which should be governed by mechanical time/motion, being as they too are massive objects, but how do they percieve this aging within the two relative aging frames, which is relative to how we define consciousness/awareness. Would ones awarness accelerate/decellerate also, whereby he didn't percieve a change in the acceleration/decelleration of his aging, or is awarness at a constant velocity, whereby any change of aging would be recognised?