Dave,
Thank you so much for your precise explanations. Now, by using your definitions, I would like to see if I can conceptualize a little without making a fool of myself.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dleviwing
Thus this does not increase the quantity of matter, only the quantity of uniform motion and results in less random motion. This can also be viewed as causing the random motion wavelengths to reduce and to be confined within a smaller spatial volume.
|
The quantity of uniform motion of all hydrogen atoms of the same temperature and at rest is always the same as stated by the special theory of relativity. This theory suggests that all atoms in this special condition of identical relative speed, and identical temperature, have the same mass. I think this is telling us that the mass is defined by the uniform motion of the particles making up the atom. Is it possible these particles are just pieces of space spinning and orbiting each other in a certian way. So mass could be defined as a way to compare the amount of uniform motion in one space compared to the amount of uniform motion in another space. So all stationary hydrogen atoms of the same temperature have the same amount of uniform motion among the individual particles or, individual pieces of space, that make up these atoms. The reason for this is, all the particles that make up these atoms are following the same pattern in their movement, and are confined in a volume that is defined by the same geometric shape for all hydrogen atoms that stationary relative to the ether, and are of the same temperature.
General Relativity tells us what happens if the spaces are being accelerated with respect to each other, for instance the ether remaining stationary and a group of atoms, or matter, are being acclerated through the ether.
Quote:
| What we observe with acceleration of an object is the conversion of the random motion of an object to the uniform motion of a linear accelerated velocity. As we stated earlier, uniform motion allows the Self-affinity bonding property to increase and thus it causes the substance of the object to condense to form an object with greater spatial density and quite likely smaller spatial dimensions. |
This straight line acceleration warps the space time continuum as it has to adjust for the change in relation between the space of the atom and the ether. This would appear as a compression wave in the ether in front of the atom, or an area of greater spatial density in the ether just ahead of the atom. It also appears as an area of lower spatial density in the ether behind the matter being accelerated. This area of lower spatial density would draw in any matter from the surrounding area, which is what we call gravity.
What Einstien couldn't explain is why is there a large area of lower spatial density, which appears as a warp in the space-time continuum in the area around a large piece of matter such as a planet or star This can even be observed as it bends the path of light from a star around our sun during a solar eclipse. Why is the ether even able to develope areas of lower spatial density? What is it made up of to give it this property? And what is the relationship between large pieces of matter and the ether that allows these large areas of lower spatial density to surround a planet even if it is relativity stationery in the ether? Could it be that the ether is made up of pieces of space, or virtual particles, that are a specific geometric shape, that fit together with a higher density in a space with no matter around to disturb their alignment, but as the ether comes into contact with matter, the matter disturbs this alignment of the virtual particles in the ether, and thus lowers the spatial density in the ether surrounding that matter and causes gravity? And this lower spatial density, or disorder in the ether is at its highest at the surface of a planet, or star.
Dave, I hope I didn't take too many liberties in trying to fit your definitions into my concept.
Brian