[dleviwing]

Hi Tim;
I don’t understand what you are referring to as “one spectrum of motion”. Our current conservation law work, though I do not believe it is due to the current interpretations made of the numbers, any theory we present therefore must account for the functionality of these laws of physics. Toronics accomplishes this by stating motion is absolute to all physical systems; nothing is exchanged between autonomous systems. The changes we proclaim as exchange of energy are the changes in how absolute motion is distributed within those observed systems; the conservation laws remain in tact.

The main point of Toronics is that one understands that literally everything physical is made of the single fundamental stuff of the universe. All the instrumentation we use to evaluate a phenomena is basically made of the same thing that the phenomena is made of; they WILL interact and thus the instrument will influence the phenomena. The double slit experiment is the most misunderstood in that the dimensional requirements of the slits have a significant effect on the results of the experiment; it is not a quantum phenomena, just interactions of fundamental matter in different states of distribution of absolute motion.

I’m going to take your advice and get off my ass to write the next phase of my blog. It might be better just to have Robert convert it into an article. With a minimum of understanding of wave mechanics, this next entry should clear up the duality confusion.