[Fredrick]

The question remains puzzling for me, though, that when declaring unity as important but not as the highest entity in our universe, that so little agreement is then abstracted from it by other people. It is almost as if uniting behind an idea, and handing it over to others, the idea must contain unity in itself as well for it to get further than a single grade of separation. The sense of unity must be strong, since I am trying, too, to get others behind my idea of non-unity (as being more paramount than unity), but only succeeding marginally. Is our brain pre-programmed to only look for that what contains unity, because success and failure are highly slanted towards those people and ideas proclaiming/containing unity?