Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar  I got your concept of the globe, when you come to the cube, you introduce the element of fake art, does it mean that the 2D is projecting itself to create the 3D?? |
No, 2D is real fake/art, and with real I mean that it exists within our materialized reality (of 3D). People make art that can be perceived as 3D even when it is just 2D. As such, 2D can be considered a part of our reality and can therefore be used in a framework to build up our reality from parts. I hope you can read that I am just describing reality here, and not some special situation from which you need to learn the deeper meaning.
It's the problem with 1D, Dipayankar, that even as a medium it does not exist. There is no experience of reality possible with 1D. It is a phantom phenomena that's simply not there. The framework of 3D is a castle in the sky. This doesn't mean that the framework of 3D should be abandoned; it is far too handy in daily use; but just like words are handy, that doesn't mean you can eat the word
bread.
The single important reason to mention that 3D contains a phantom aspect is the fact that our theory of everything can then not be build (which is the main reason we are communicating on this site). Yet, when building up a dimensional reality starting out with fields, we are able get to the theory of everything. That's my whole point: we have a reality, and we can break it down into fields. Period. We cannot break reality down into directions, because directions are not independent aspects, but intrinsic parts of the whole. No one ever saw a single direction all by itself. Fields, fake as may be, can be independent aspects.
P.S. Did you notice the QM qualities of the two fields in the dimensional globe? 3D is inherently static, and while the street we live in may appear to be somewhat static, too, the real universe we also live in is definitively not.