Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  (1) I thought it was just a type-O, but I see you used “mason” (a person who works with concrete) rather than “meson” (a boson particle in physics) in your blog pages also. (2) Mesons however are too massive and do not decay rapidly enough to be considered for the Higgs Boson. (3) I do agree however that the structure of space (Aether) can be viewed as a boson structure; I stated such in a post quite some time ago. |
Hi David
(1) I chose the word mason (pronounced mazon) to denote that it was the mechanism that creates real particles and hence mass. As you say, it means 'builder' and that fits nicely. It also sounds like the French word 'maison' which is house; my concept is that the mason is the mechanism that houses matter (quarks) when they are not in existence and builds them in response to the collapsing waveforms when particle interactions take place.
(2) The mason has no connection with mesons but as the provider of mass it is my equivalent of the Higgs boson though my mechanism is completely different.
(3) I would not describe the aether as bosonic as bosons are supposedly the particles which mitigate the four forces of nature. I don't agree with this concept and think that all four forces can be described as effects related to the motion of matter.
regards
Felix
And woe to us if, blinded by illusions,
We detach ourselves from the dancing cosmos,
This universal harmony.......Ruth Peel