Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat  Thanks for your input. I think we have much agreement regarding the strong and weak force.
(1) As I recall you believe the binding is due to gluons and I believe it to be EM Force. Also I have no problems with you eliminating gravitons, (is that what you are doing? ), in that I eliminated gluons, from my An Idea, as being unnecessary.
(2) Additionally, your description of gravity, and it being an effect as stated in Einstein's GR is OK. If there is an ether moving at light speed, (which would explain the speed limit at c, and why photons move at that speed,) this would account for why the gravitational effect and EMR are both at that speed, and have infinite range.( However we would perhaps have to rethink Einstein's GR.)
(3) So any thoughts about gravity and light? Again I believe them to be the same, but opposite. |
Hi Profpat
(1) No - gluons are the bosons of the strong force and I don't find them necessary. The strong force is due to the quarks coming from the same place (a mason) and a force is necessary to break them appart. The 'gluon' is just the measure of that force. I haven't eliminated gravitons - just adapted them to do the job described in GR.
(2) The aether is the gravitational field and therefore does not move - it is static. The action of gravity is a function of the aether (the fabric of spacetime) and is not, therefore, subject to any restriction in its speed of action.
(3) I have no clear idea how light works at present, other than what I have already posted about W/P duality, but I don't see it as the opposite of gravity - perhaps you can convince me otherwise???
regards
Felix
PS - I'm reading 'The Final Theory' by Mark McCutcheon and very interesting it is too. I don't subscribe to his expansion theory at all but his detailed expositions on the problems with current scientific explanations are fascinating. Thanks for the link.